ВсеПрибалтикаУкраинаБелоруссияМолдавияЗакавказьеСредняя Азия
At the OpenAI all-hands, staff were told that the most challenging aspect of the deal for leadership was concern over foreign surveillance, and that there was a major worry about AI-driven surveillance threatening democracy, according to the source. However, company leaders also seemed to acknowledge the reality that governments will spy on adversaries internationally, recognizing claims that national security officers “can’t do their jobs” without international surveillance capabilities. References were made to threat intelligence reports showing that China was already using AI models to target dissidents overseas.
，推荐阅读Line官方版本下载获取更多信息
Мерц резко сменил риторику во время встречи в Китае09:25。safew官方版本下载对此有专业解读
The real annoying thing about Opus 4.6/Codex 5.3 is that it’s impossible to publicly say “Opus 4.5 (and the models that came after it) are an order of magnitude better than coding LLMs released just months before it” without sounding like an AI hype booster clickbaiting, but it’s the counterintuitive truth to my personal frustration. I have been trying to break this damn model by giving it complex tasks that would take me months to do by myself despite my coding pedigree but Opus and Codex keep doing them correctly. On Hacker News I was accused of said clickbaiting when making a similar statement with accusations of “I haven’t had success with Opus 4.5 so you must be lying.” The remedy to this skepticism is to provide more evidence in addition to greater checks and balances, but what can you do if people refuse to believe your evidence?